Legal Opinion

Coggan v. Coggan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 2, 1968No. 68-102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANN, Judge.

If the rules of procedure in this state forbid the order appealed from they ought to be amended.

Since their divorce in 1963 these parties have owned in common a building used by the appellant as a medical office. At the pretrial conference in appellee’s suit for partition her attorney announced to the court that the appellee’s appraiser had not yet been given access to the premises for the purpose of preparing to testify, the rental value of the property being in question. Request had been made to appellant’s attorney, but permission had not been granted.' The appeal is…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Shapiro v. FreemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Burton R. Raughley v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  4. Roberts v. BraynonSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  5. Hammond-Knowlton v. Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. of Hartford, Conn.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pettie v. KronbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. Allstate Insurance v. CaosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API