Legal Opinion
Scott v. Donovan
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided May 6, 1982No. C80-2243APublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOYE, Chief Judge.
The above-styled matter is before the Court on several motions: (1) plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint to add the City of Atlanta, Georgia, as a defendant; (2) defendant Donovan’s motion for summary judgment; and (3) the City of Atlanta’s motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint to add the City of Atlanta, Georgia, as a direct defendant, having been read and considered, is hereby GRANTED. The Court will consider the City’s motion for summary judgment as seeking dismissal both as a direct defendant and as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gregg v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Dennis Paul Lipton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Deary v. Three Un-Named Police OfficersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- B.C.R. Transport Co., Inc. v. Norman FontaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Gilmere v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Barnier v. SzentmiklosiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.