Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 28, 1934No. 9456PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY, Justice.

This is a proceeding in garnishment instituted by defendant in error J. L. Gray against plaintiffs in error, Armour & Co. of Illinois and Armour & Co. of Delaware.

A writ of garnishment in the usual form was issued against plaintiffs in error, in an attempt to collect a judgment previously obtained by defendant in error against one Felix Muleski, in the sum of $3,500. Plaintiffs in error filed identical answers, and in so far as they attempted to answer the interrogatories contained in the writ, read as follows:

“That neither at the time of the service of said Writ of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Capps v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of LongviewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Manufacturers' Nat. Bank of Racine v. Peoria Life Ins.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1924
  3. Bruner v. Commerce Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brasher v. Carnation Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Gray v. Armour & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API