Legal Opinion
Gray v. Armour & Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1937No. 6863PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge German
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
Plaintiff in error, J. L. Gray, holding a judgment against one Felix Muleski, brought a garnishment proceeding against defendants in error, Armour & Company of Illinois, and Armour & Company of Delaware. Writ of garnishment was duly issued, and defendants in error each made answer. Among the things which they were required to answer under oath was, what other persons, if any within their knowledge, had effects in their possession belonging to said Muleski. This inquiry they failed to answer. The trial court found…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lamb-McAshan Co. v. EllisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Jemison v. ScarboroughTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Freeman v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Kentucky Oil Corp. v. DavidTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Norton v. B. & A. Drilling Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Investors Diversified Services, Inc. v. BrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Healy v. Wick Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- JC Hadsell & Co., Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Handy Andy, Inc. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
- First National Bank in Dallas v. Banco Longoria, S. A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.