Legal Opinion

Rhoden v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1925No. 4585PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

To the ruling announced in the first headnote, holding that the statute therein quoted is not violative of the provisions of the constitution therein specified, the following may be added. In the case of Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co., 122 Ga. 509 (3), 516, 519 (50 S. E. 353, 69 L. R. A. 90, 106 Am. St. R. 137, 2 Ann. Cas. 694), it was held: “The malicious procurement of a breach of contract of employment, resulting in damage, where the procurement was during the subsistence of the contract, is an actionable wrong.” In the opinion it was said: “ The term ‘malicious/ used in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Luke v. DuPreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Toney v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. McMichael v. Atlanta Envelope Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Fortune v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Braden v. Haas, Howell & DoddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API