Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Town of Brookhaven

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

Plaintiff brings this action for a declaratory judgment: that the defendant’s Zoning Ordinance and map are contrary to a comprehensive plan and therefore ineffective, that plaintiff’s property is confiscated by its present use, and that the refusal of the defendant to rezone the property was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, discriminatory and confiscatory.

The plaintiff Rogers is the owner of a parcel of land located on the southerly side of Route 25-A, East Setauket, totalling approximately four and one-half acres, with roughly 340 feet fronting on Route 25-A. The depth of this parcel is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Town of Hempstead v. LynneNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Capobianco v. Town of North HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington County v. StearnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API