Legal Opinion

Saks & Co. v. Nager

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided June 15, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBentley Kassal, J.

The issue is whether a vendor, after receiving the usual notice from a husband disclaiming liability for his wife’s future debts, may, nevertheless, hold him responsible for subsequent purchases of necessaries even though the store had opened a new charge account in the wife’s name, based upon her credit..

Plaintiff is suing both husband and wife; each defendant, while disavowing personal liability to plaintiff, has, in turn, *856cross-claimed against the other in the event judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

The parties were married in September, 1968 and shortly thereafter a Saks…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bloomingdale Bros. v. BenjaminCity of New York Municipal Court · 1951
  2. Gimbel Bros. v. SteinmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  3. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. SeizerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Our Lady of Lourdes Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. FreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API