Legal Opinion

Bloomingdale Bros. v. Benjamin

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 22, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGivern, J.

In this nonjury action, the plaintiff store seeks to recover the contract price of certain merchandise (mostly food) purchased at the instance of the defendant wife, and the defendant husband has been joined on the theory that the goods were necessaries for which the wife as agent had a right to obligate him.

The defendants Benjamin were married in December of 1941, and by normal standards, until their separation in 1949, apparently lived on a grandiose scale. Appurtenances to their living were a thirty-room summer home at Southampton and a twenty-room apartment in town, maintained by an…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v. Lewis S. RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. Gimbel Bros. v. SteinmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  3. Amplo v. Di MauroSuffolk County District Court · 1967
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. SeizerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
  5. Saks & Co. v. NagerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API