Bours v. Tuckerman
New York Supreme Court
N. WILLIAMS, for the defendant, moved to discharge the defendant from the arrest, and to set aside the capias and proceedings in this cause. He read an affidavit, statin8>t that on the gth of October last the defendant was un(ier recognisance to appear at the next general sessions of the peace, to be held in Madison county, on the r first Tuesday of January last.
Read the full summary
N. WILLIAMS, for the defendant, moved to discharge the defendant from the arrest, and to set aside the capias and proceedings in this cause. He read an affidavit, statin8>t that on the gth of October last the defendant was un(ier recognisance to appear at the next general sessions of the peace, to be held in Madison county, on the r first Tuesday of January last. He appeared at the ses- . ' n , sions, and while he was attending, and betore he was discharged from his recognisance, he was arrested by the sheriff of Madi~on, on a cap ~as ad respondendurn, issued out of this court, at the suit of…
1Per curiam
The defendant was privileged from arrest, as it appears that he had no opportunity to apply to the court below to be discharged, and as this court ought not to suffer its process to be executed in violation of the privileges of other courts, the defendant must be discharged from the bail-bond, and the arrest, on filing common bail, unless the plaintiff should elect, as he may, to waive the arrest altogether, and issue new process.
Motion granted.
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HookerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1845
- Christian v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Sanford v. ChaseNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- Thompson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Larned v. GriffinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.