Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Marsh

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 6, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, V. C.

The bill is filed to enforce the provisions of a restrictive covenant. Both complainant and defendant derive title from a common grantor, the executors of Erwin J. Crane. Crane owned a considerable tract of land along a street in Montclair known as Sunset Park Worth. There is no doubt but that there was a plan of development adopted by which it was contemplated that, no house should be built upon any of the property, the main structure of which should be within seventy-five feet of Sunset Park Worth. In the deeds which were made, including that to defendant, there was this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cornell v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API