Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2011No. 10-35458, 10-35592UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM * , **
Defendant-Appellant E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company (“DuPont”), the manufacturer of the herbicide Oust, appeals from the district court’s judgment and post-trial orders following a jury trial. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1294(1). Because the facts of this case are well known by the parties we do not repeat them here, except as necessary.
1. The district court found that Plaintiffs presented evidence that at most showed DuPont’s nonfeasance, which cannot, as a matter of law, support an assumed duty of care claim. It therefore granted DuPont’s Rule…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador Laurel, Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador LaurelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- H.N. Dang v. Gilbert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Go Daddy Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cabasug v. Crane Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Glenn v. B & R Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2018
- Specter v. Rainbow King Lodge, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2021