Legal Opinion

Salesian Soc. v. Formigli Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 15, 1973PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

124 N.J. Super. 270 (1973)

306 A.2d 466

SALESIAN SOCIETY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

FORMIGLI CORPORATION, EDWARD REIHL COMPANY, INC. AND WILLIAM REIHL AND EILEEN REIHL WOJTECKI, INDIVIDUALLY AS THE LAST OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF EDWARD REIHL COMPANY, INC., A DISSOLVED CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 30, 1973.

Decided June 15, 1973.

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, MATTHEWS and CRAHAY.

Mr. William F. Tuohey argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Milton, Keane & Brady, attorneys; Mr. Prospero DeBona on the brief).

Mr. Frank R. Cinquina argued the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Salesian Society v. Formigli Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. E. A. Williams, Inc. v. Russo Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. Hall v. Luby Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Lawrence, Dykes, Goodenberger, Bower & ClancyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API