Legal Opinion

Harman v. Forssenius

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 27, 1965No. 360PublishedCited by 642 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren

We are called upon in this case to construe, for the first time, the Twenty-fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

“The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.”

The precise issue is whether § 24-17.2 of the Virginia Code — which provides that in order to qualify to vote in federal elections one…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by642 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

637 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API