Legal Opinion

Zellner v. Murdoch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1929No. Appeal, 171PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Mrs. Murdoch, the defendant, was the owner of certain real estate in the City of Pittsburgh. Her attorneys were Marshall & Marshall, father and son. The former, the elder Marshall, entered into negotiations for the sale of one of her properties through an agent of his selection. The latter interested the subsequent purchaser, but no terms were agreed upon prior to Marshall’s departure for Europe in January. Soon thereafter, the plaintiff, Zellner, a real estate broker, learned the name of the counsel who represented generally the owner, and called upon the son,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keys v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  2. Bossart v. Erie Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Gross v. KincaidSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Samuels v. LuckenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Lanard Axilbund v. Thompson P. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Starling v. West Erie Avenue Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Axilbund v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Shapira v. Union Trust Co., Exr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Seligson v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Follansbee EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API