Legal Opinion

Ray Rush Shellie Rush, Cross-Appellees v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 8, 1989No. 88-2505, 88-2553PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of these appeals. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cases are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Ray Rush and Shellie Rush (plaintiffs) are Oklahoma residents insured under an automobile policy purchased from the Travelers Indemnity Company (defendant). The policy was issued and executed in Oklahoma and covered two vehicles. On July 24, 1986, one of the plaintiffs (Shellie Rush) was injured in a collision between…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Jeanne Armsted Rhody and Donnell Rhody v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Brown v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. DickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Werden v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2009
  2. Duong v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  3. Lauren Luizzi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
  4. United States v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Wamsley v. NODAK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYMontana Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API