Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Jonas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1975No. 74-2133PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before HUFSTEDLER, CHOY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The almost interminable litigation over the tangled affairs of Wonderbowl, Inc., and Wonderbowl-Downey, Inc., commenced when petitions for their reorganization were filed in 1967 under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, is finally grinding to a close. Multiple lawsuits and hovering foreclosures prevented any feasible reorganization plan. Strenuous and prolonged efforts of the reorganization trustee, Jonas, ultimately resulted in sales, a lease, and compromises that together became the Amended Compromise approved by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
In Re Solar Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
In Re v. Loewer's Gambrinus Brewery Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
In the Matter of Equity Funding Corporation of America, Debtor. Financial Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Robert M. Loeffler, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
In the Matter of Wonderbowl, Inc., a California Corporation, Debtor. Caruso Enterprises, Inc. v. A. J. Bumb, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Wonderbowl, Inc. v. JonasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975