Rose v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Chief Justice:
A grand jury indicted Rose for (1) Trafficking in Cocaine, (2) Possession with Intent to Deliver, (3) Maintaining a Dwelling for Keeping Controlled Substances, and two other charges. The indictment for Maintaining a Dwelling referenced Counts I and II. The jury acquitted Rose of those two Counts but convicted Rose on the Maintaining a Dwelling charge. Rose argues on appeal that his conviction is based on insufficient evidence because Counts I and II were predicate offenses on which the jury acquitted him. We find no merit to Rose’s argument and affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trenwick America Litigation Trust v. BillettSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Priest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grayson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Mundell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Suchomel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016