Legal Opinion

Rose v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 23, 2012No. 716, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

A grand jury indicted Rose for (1) Trafficking in Cocaine, (2) Possession with Intent to Deliver, (3) Maintaining a Dwelling for Keeping Controlled Substances, and two other charges. The indictment for Maintaining a Dwelling referenced Counts I and II. The jury acquitted Rose of those two Counts but convicted Rose on the Maintaining a Dwelling charge. Rose argues on appeal that his conviction is based on insufficient evidence because Counts I and II were predicate offenses on which the jury acquitted him. We find no merit to Rose’s argument and affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Trenwick America Litigation Trust v. BillettSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. Priest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grayson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  2. Mundell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  3. Suchomel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API