Lamar & Rankin Drug Co. v. Jones
Supreme Court of Alabama
Bill to Set Aside Conveyances as Fraud on Creditors. Appeal, from Houston Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. W. L. Park. Bill by tlie Lamar-Rankin Drug Company against H. C. Jones, and others to set aside certain mortgages. From .a decree dismissing tlie bill, defendants appeal. The bill is filed under section 2156, Code 1896. The chancellor erred in sustaining the 9th and 10th ground of demurrer. — Henderson v. Farley Nat.
Read the full summary
Bill to Set Aside Conveyances as Fraud on Creditors. Appeal, from Houston Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. W. L. Park. Bill by tlie Lamar-Rankin Drug Company against H. C. Jones, and others to set aside certain mortgages. From .a decree dismissing tlie bill, defendants appeal. The bill is filed under section 2156, Code 1896. The chancellor erred in sustaining the 9th and 10th ground of demurrer. — Henderson v. Farley Nat. Bank, 123 Ala. 547; (Jarran v. Arm-stead, 101 Ala. 692; Ruse v. Bromberg, 88 Ala. 628; .Sims v.' Gaines, 64 Ala. 392; Hill v. Rutledge, 83 Ala. 162. The bill is not…
1Opinion of the CourtDenson, J.
This bill is filed by Lamar & Rankin Drug Company, a corporation, a simple contract creditor, against H. O. Jones, M. S. Stough, and R. L. Stough, to set aside two mortgages, executed by H. O. Jones to M. S. Stough, on the fixtures in a drug store and a stock of drugs in the same store, as haying been executed with *476the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud the creditors of the mortgagor, and to set aside a sale and transfer of the same property by Jones to R. L. Stough as having been made with a like intent. Separate motions were made by the respondents to dismiss the bill for the want of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonald v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Hinds v. HindsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Cartwright v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Steiner & Lobman v. Parker & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Howell v. CardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murrell v. PetersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Moody v. MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927