Legal Opinion

Cartwright v. Bamberger, Bloom & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the City Court, of Decatur, in equity. Heard before the Hon. Wm. H. Simpson.

1Opinion of the CourtSomebyille, J.

The bill is filed by the appellees, as attaching creditors of Isaac Pinlms & Co., they having already acquired a lien by a writ of attachment issued from a court of law, and levied on certain personal goods of the defendants in attachment, who are alleged to be insolvent. Its purpose is to assail, as collusive and fraudulent, a prior writ of attachment issuing from the same law court, at the suit of the appel*406lant Cartwright; also, to enjoin, the sheriff from paying over the fund arising from the sale of the goods to such prior attaching creditor, and subject so much of the fund in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Horton v. SledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  2. Hale v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Martin v. MichaelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  4. Heyneman v. DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  5. May v. Courtnay, Tennant & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Steiner & Lobman v. Parker & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Freeman v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Comer v. HeidelbachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Alabama Iron & Steel Co. v. McKeeverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API