Legal Opinion
Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. Texas Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 4, 1927No. 271PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, District Judge.
This is a suit asserting the validity of three United States patents, Nos. 1,465,598, 1,429,175, and 1,523,314, charging defendant with infringement of them, asking an injunction against further infringement, and an accounting for profits from past infringement.
The first numbered patent, No. 1,465,598, was issued to De Brey, a foreign patentee, upon an application filed June 1, 1918, entitled for improvements in a “process for the treating of hydrocarbons,” and, as stated by plaintiff in its brief, “this patent was acquired by plaintiff after its issuance, and upon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Kurtz v. Belle Hat Lining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Market Street Cable Railway Co. v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- H. D. Smith & Co. v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Butex Gas Co. v. Southern Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Vincent v. Suni-Citrus Products Co. Food Processes, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp. Dan B. Vincent, Inc. v. Minute Maid CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
- Edwards v. Johnston Formation Testing Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1930
- Otis Pressure Control, Inc. v. Guiberson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.