Legal Opinion

Brancoveanu v. Brancoveanu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A review of the record of the proceedings before this court on November 27, 1991, confirms our preliminary conclusion that the instant appeal was indeed "frivolous” as that term is defined by 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) (see, Brancoveanu v Brancoveanu, 177 AD2d 615, supra). Although he failed to demonstrate before the Supreme Court any change in circumstances to necessitate a downward modification of the child support award, the plaintiff nonetheless appealed from the court’s denial of his application for that relief. It was revealed at the hearing before this court that the plaintiff had available…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Belsky v. BelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Strout Realty Inc. v. MechtaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Brancoveanu v. BrancoveanuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martino v. MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Muller v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Murray v. National Broadcasting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API