Amyot v. Caron
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
The act (Laws 1921, c. 226) which creates and defines the rights and duties of the Finance Commission of Manchester is outlined in Attorney-General v. Bond, 81 N. H. 269, 270, 271. As there stated, the members of the commission “must all be inhabitants and qualified voters of the city . . .; their duties relate entirely to the city of Manchester and their service is rendered solely for the benefit of that city; they are to investigate and report as to its financial affairs (s. 2); to veto action of the mayor and aldermen as to appropriating money or raising it by borrowing or taxation, or to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PlaistedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Huntington v. WorthenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- State ex rel. Bulkeley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Braxton County Court v. West Virginia Ex Rel. State Tax CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Smith v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Towns of Madbury v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Towns of Madbury v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975