Legal Opinion

Cuttino v. Mimms

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1958No. 37296PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

We will deal first with the demurrers filed by the defendant to the plaintiffs’ petition. We have set out the petition somewhat in detail. It is our opinion that the petition is sufficient to withstand a general demurrer notwithstanding what was said by this court in Vandalsem v. Caldwell, 33 Ga. App. 88 (7) (125 S. E. 716), a case cited by counsel for the defendant which states as follows: “The test of the sufficiency of a petition as against a general demurrer is whether the defendant can admit all the allegations therein contained and at the same time escape all…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. SpinksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Rabun v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Fain v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Callan Court Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Gay v. HealanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Cash Register Co. v. HaakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API