Legal Opinion

School Dist. 1 v. Snowflake Union High School District

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1966No. 8123PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.

This case is before us on appeal from the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus, by the Superior Court of Navajo County, Judge William A. Holohan, presiding.

The same operative facts set out in length in Cause No. 8511, decided by us this date, Stuart v. Winslow Elementary School Dist. No. 1, Navajo County, Ariz., 414 P.2d 976, are involved herein and will not be repeated. In that case we determined, inter alia, that the peremptory writ of mandamus as ordered by Judge Holohan August 22, 1963, was not res judicata of the issues in the certiorari action pending…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dockery v. Central Arizona Light & Power Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Bell v. BellArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Stuart v. Winslow Elementary School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Henderson v. TowleArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Lee v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of HadtrathArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stuart v. Winslow Elementary School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Walker v. DaviesArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Roberson v. TeelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  5. Duncan v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Ex Rel. Estate of PopCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API