Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1934No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 37,590PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is certiorari to review an award of the department of labor and industry granting plaintiff specific compensation for 100 weeks for loss of an eye. The question is whether the claim is barred by the statute of limitations, 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 8431, which provides that claim for compen sation shall be made within six months after an accident :

“Provided, however, That in all cases in which the employer has been given notice of the injury, or has notice or knowledge of the same within three months after the happening thereof, but the actual injury, disability or incapacity does not develop…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gallup v. Western Board & Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Millaley v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hovey v. General Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hayes v. BoutellMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Greene v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Detroit Steel Casting Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Catino v. Morgan & Wright Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wilson v. Tittle Bros. Packing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Giampa v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API