Legal Opinion

Maddox v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 25, 1968No. 43888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

1. The defendant’s brief on the merits fails to specify in Part Two which enumerations are insisted upon, and nothing in this brief by way of citation of authority or argument appears to be directed to the first enumeration, insofar as this enumeration preserves as an issue the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, or to any issues within the scope of the ninth, eleventh, twelfth and fourteenth enumerations, and these issues are deemed to be abandoned. Rule 17 (c) (2), this court.

2. The second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, tenth and thirteenth…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Whippler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Salisbury v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Hargett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API