Legal Opinion
In re Ernst B.
New York City Family Court
Decided May 19, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael J. Miller, J.
Respondent has moved this court requesting dismissal of the petition in this matter as facially defective pursuant to Family Court Act § 315.1. Respondent argues that the petition is insuf*23ficient because it does not contain nonhearsay allegations of fact which, if true, establish every element of the crimes charged and respondent’s commission of those crimes as required by Family Court Act §§ 311.1 and 311.2. Respondent’s motion is based on his argument that the supporting deposition does not supply the necessary nonhearsay allegations because it is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re Jahron S.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re Edward B.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Matter of Nelson R.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re Henry M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. KenrickCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. JacksonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2007
- In re Tyrone M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re Tyrone M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016