Legal Opinion
National R v. Inc. v. Foreman
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1995No. D018336PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
This case presents the issue whether the coach portion of a motorhome is subject to the provisions of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, 2 § 1790 et seq.). We conclude it is.
Facts
In May 1990, Julius E. Foreman and his wife, Maxine I. Foreman, purchased a new 1990 Dolphin motorhome from 10,000 R.V. Sales for $56,905.41. National R.V., Inc., (National) manufactured and expressly warranted the coach portion of the motorhome, that is, the portion of the motorhome designed primarily for human habitation. National purchased the chassis portion of the motorhome from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Suman v. BMW of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Southern California Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brady v. Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Cummins, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Asghari v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.