Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1931No. 12,481PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bubkb

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. For convenience we refer to them as plaintiffs and defendant.

Plaintiffs alleged the cutting- by defendant of a certain embankment, the consequent flooding* of their lands, and the threat of continuance. They ask that such action be enjoined, that the embankment be restored, and that their title be quieted against defendant’s claim of right to discharge waters on said lands. Defendant denies the acts charged, alleges certain wrongful acts of plaintiffs and others which caused the waters to accumulate and threaten her crops, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Boulder v. Boulder & White Rock Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Debevtz v. New Brantner Extension Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Ramsey v. RadenburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Johnson v. KraegerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Calvaresi v. BRANNAN SAND & GRAVEL COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API