Legal Opinion

Debevtz v. New Brantner Extension Ditch Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 21, 1925No. 11,187PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

For convenience we hereinafter refer to plaintiff in error as plaintiff, and defendant in error as defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff was owner and lessee of certain agricultural lands and defendant was operating a certain irrigation canal. Plaintiff alleged that between May 1, 1923, and June 25, following, defendant operated its ditch so negligently as to destroy his crops, and that such injury was inflicted with wanton and reckless disregard of his rights. He demanded actual and exemplary damages. The defendant alleged adverse possession and use of the wasteway in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Boulder v. Boulder & White Rock Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Whitla v. QuarlesIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Alexander v. WellingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. Percy Consolidated Mining Co. v. HallamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. Goldberger v. LeibowitzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hankins v. BorlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. Ambrosio v. Perl-Mack Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Colorado Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. City and County of Denver v. Stanley Aviation Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API