Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Ingerson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1906No. Docket No. 143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Barry; Smith J. Assumpsit by William O. Freeman against Stephen S. Ingerson for the value of certain wheat stored with defendant. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

William O. Freeman, the plaintiff above named, commenced an action of assumpsit in justice’s court against the defendant, Stephen S. Ingerson, July 27, 1903, whereupon the defendant filed a plea of the gen*8eral issue and gave notice of the defense of the statute of limitations. The case was tried in justice’s court, where a verdict of no cause of action was rendered, and came into the circuit court for the county of Barry by appeal, where, upon the second trial of the same, a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for $135.94, and judgment duly entered, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Burlingame TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Ball v. Keokuk & Northwestern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Smith v. Estate of SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Debancourt's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. General Discount Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Williams v. Flagg Storage Warehouse Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Volli v. WirthMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. DesNoyer v. Salvation ArmyMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API