Legal Opinion

Keener v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On Trial to the Court. Ejectment.

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

I have two cases that were argued at last term which I wish to dispose of first. One is the case of Keener v. Union Pac. Ry. Co. There are two actions, but the same facts appear in each. The action is one of ejectment, to recover a portion of the right of way of the defendant railroad company. The facts are these: In 1866, the quarter section over which this right of way runs was the property of Charles F. Groesclaud, a resident of this county. He conveyed it on that day to William McMurphy, of Illinois. The deed was recorded. In 1868, condemnation proceedings w'ere instituted under the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Gladys City Oil, Gas & Manufacturing Co. v. Right of Way Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Marion, Bluffton & Eastern Traction Co. v. SimmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Salt Lake Investment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Parker v. BettsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API