Legal Opinion

Allen v. Rogers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 120, Calendar No. 34,154PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The defendant has brought error to review the judgment of the Wayne circuit court in quashing the proceedings instituted by him as highway commissioner to take the plaintiffs’ lands for the widening of Grand River avenue, part of which is situated within the corporate limits of the city of Detroit.

The record presents the following questions:

1. Does the statute make mandatory a bona fide effort to acquire the lands by purchase as a condition precedent to the right to institute condemnation proceedings ?

The proceedings were brought under authority of Act No. 352, Pub. Acts 1925, as amended by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. In Re Petition of RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Loomis v. HartzMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Case v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Allen v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. In Re State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. State Highway Commissioner v. Ottawa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. City of Dearborn v. Sugden & Sivier, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API