Legal Opinion

Raylite Trading Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 7, 1956No. Reap. Dec. 8634; Entry No. 764188PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olivee, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, which involve certain incandescent electric-light bulbs exported from Japan between October 27, 1939, and December 19, 1939, were the subject of my decision in Raylite Trading Co., Inc., et al. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 589, Reap. Dec. 8292. The question presented relates to an appraisement under the Antidumping Act of 1921, in which the appraiser found there was no foreign market value, as such value is defined in section 205 of the Antidumping Act of 1921, for the articles in question, and that, as to each of these items, the cost…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muser v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Raylite Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Raylite Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Raylite Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API