Legal Opinion

Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. Poling

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1934No. 1205PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*50OPINION

By BARNES, J.

In the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error the claimed errors are summarized and discussed in somewhat different form and order than in the petition in error, and we will take up and consider them in the same order as in the brief.

On pages 2 and 3 these several points of error are set out as follows:

*51I. The defendant is entitled to judgment on the answers to the special interrogatories which are inconsistent with the general verdict and show contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff.

II. The trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for defendant as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Potomac Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Esterly v. Youngstown Arc Engraving Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Epps v. Clymer Materials Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API