Takisada Co. v. Ambassador Factors Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
In this dispute over the interpretation of a factoring agreement, defendant Ambassador Factors Corp. moves for sum*436mary judgment to dismiss the complaint and for an award of counsel fees on its counterclaim. Plaintiff, Takisada American Corp., moves to amend its complaint to declare the factoring agreement to be unconscionable. Takisada, its predecessors and affiliates, is a manufacturer or distributor of piece goods. In 1969, Takisada entered into a factoring agreement with Ambassador Factors pursuant to which Takisada would assign all its accounts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Equitable Lumber Corp. v. IPA Land Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hertz Corp. v. Attorney-General of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- State Bank of India v. Walter E. Heller & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- BAKALAR v. VavraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- 21st Mortgage ,formerly 21st Century Mortgage Corp. v. Capitol Homes, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- Advantage Funding Corp. v. Mid-TN Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- General Assembly Space, Inc. v. Social Finance Career Impact Bond General Assembly LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024