In re Roseland Amusement Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentBrewster, J.
During the years in question the appellant operated a ballroom in the city of New York, and therein provided certain facilities for dancing by such members of the public as became its patrons. In doing this from time to time it engaged certain well known maestros and their “ named ” orchestras or bands to render their services in producing dance music at stated performances. Whether, under the arrangements whereby such engagements were secured, the leaders and members of the orchestras were employees of the appellant within the meaning of the statute (Unemployment Insurance Law [Labor Law]…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In re the Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of Labor LawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re the Liability for Unemployment Insurance Contributions under Article 18 of the Labor Law of Fidel Ass'n New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Savoy Ballroom Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Karnik v. HuttonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948