Legal Opinion
Karnik v. Hutton
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided November 1, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRivers, J.
Motions numbers 75 of August 9, 1948, and 49 of August 20, 1948, have been consolidated..
The contract on its face indicates that the defendant and all the members of her band are the employees of the night club where they work. The contract of employment so designates them and is signed by the owner of the night club as employer. The defendant herself, the leader of the band, is indicated in the contract to be the representative of the employees, and she signed the contract as such representative. The contract provides for thirteen musicians plus one vocalist and the number of these employees…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- In re the Claim for Credit under Article 18 of Labor LawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re for Claim Under Benefits Under Article 18 of the Labor LawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- In Re the Claim of EarleNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Glaser v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Goldfarb v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1948