Legal Opinion

Meadows v. City of Oklahoma City

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 2024No. 5:23-cv-00581Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) CORTEZ N. MEADOWS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. CIV-23-581-PRW CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant City of Oklahoma City’s (“City’s”) Motion to Dismiss Portion of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt. 11). Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed no response. The Court exercises its discretion to deem the Motion (Dkt. 11) confessed.1 This action arises out of an interaction between Plaintiff Cortez Meadows and four Oklahoma City Police Department (“OCPD”) officers in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Udine Ellis, Guardian for Lateasha Pendergrass v. Cleveland Municipal School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Alpenglow Botanicals, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Barrios v. Haskell Cnty. Pub. Facilities Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API