Legal Opinion

State v. Amundson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 2006No. A04-2072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

In this appeal from convictions and a sentence for first- and fifth-degree con*563trolled substance crime, appellant argues that the warrant authorizing the search of his house was not supported by probable cause and that the search-warrant application did not contain sufficient information supporting the no-knock and nighttime provisions of the warrant. Appellant also argues that the enhancement of his sentence under the firearm-enhancement statute violated his Sixth Amendment rights under Blakely. We conclude that the information supporting the no-knock and nighttime…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitten v. City of OmahaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2016
  2. State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API