Legal Opinion

Siletchnik v. Brookline Rent Control Board

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 27, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dolan, PJ.

Article XXXVIII of the Brookline rent control by-law provides in relevant part as follows: “Section 9. Evictions, (a) No person shall bring any action to recover possession of acontrolledrentalunitunless:... (2) thetenanthasviolated an obligation or covenant of his tenancy.... If the board finds that the facts attested to in the landlord’s petition are valid... the certificate of eviction shall be issued....”

The appellant landlord (“landlord”) applied to the rent control board of Brookline (“board”) for a certificate of eviction seeking to evict two tenants (“appellee tenants”) on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Lynn Ice Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Wit v. Commercial Hotel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Healthco, Inc. v. E & S REALTY ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. Brockton Young Men's Christian Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Slavin v. Rent Control Board of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zuker v. Clerk-Magistrate of the Brookline Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API