Gillette's Appeal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Appeal from the allowance of a claim against the estate of Amos Hills of Southbury, deceased, for nursing, care and attendance, taken by his administrator to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Bennett, J.; facts found and judgment rendered disallowing the claim, from which the claimant appealed to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.
The first reason of appeal is that the court erred in the denial of a motion to erase the appeal from the docket. General Statutes, § 409, allows an appeal, by any person aggrieved, from the doings of the commissioners on an insolvent estate; and § 410 provides that in such appeals the interest of the appellant shall be stated in the motion for appeal, unless it appears on the face of the proceedings or records of the Court of Probate.
In taking this appeal, the appellant’s interest in the estate appeared as that of administrator. “An executor, administrator, or trustee of an express trust,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Potter v. . CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Brown v. TuttleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- O'LEARY v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Avery, Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Clark v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Bartlett v. RaidartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.