Legal Opinion
City of Daytona Beach v. Tuttle
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 27, 1993No. 92-1523PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
630 So.2d 586 (1993)
The CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, Appellant,
v.
James R. TUTTLE, Appellee.
No. 92-1523.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
August 27, 1993.
Rehearing Denied September 27, 1993.
Frank B. Gummey, III, and Marie Hartman, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Glenn D. Storch, Daytona Beach, for appellee.
COBB, Justice.
The City of Daytona Beach appeals from an adverse judgment quieting title in the plaintiff below, James R. Tuttle, in respect to a narrow strip of land abutting the Halifax River within the City. The property in dispute is on the easterly side of Sickler Drive…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. WorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Brickell v. Town of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- City of Tarpon Springs v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Kramer v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Burkart v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bentz v. McDanielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Reynolds v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Whetstone v. City of St. AugustineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016