Legal Opinion

Espinoza 323955 v. Shinn

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 2, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01014Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO JL 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Francisco M. Espinoza, No. CV 20-01014-PHX-MTL (MHB) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 David Shinn, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Francisco M. Espinoza, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison 16 Complex (ASPC)-Eyman, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 § 1983 (Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 5). The Court will 18 order Defendants Shinn and Carr in their individual capacities to answer the Eighth 19 Amendment claims in the Complaint. 20…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API