Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ciccone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1934No. Appeal, 245PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Joseph Ciccone, as principal, and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, as surety, executed a bond to the Commonwealth for the use of any and every person interested, conditioned that if the principal pay all sums of money which may be due any person, co-partnership, association or corporation “for all material furnished and labor supplied or performed in the prosecution of the work [of improving a state highway] whether or not the said material or labor enter into and become component parts of the work or improvement contemplated, then this obligation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philadelphia v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Commonwealth v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Philadelphia v. Jackson & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Lancaster v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Commonwealth v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Walters Tire Service, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Pandolfo v. Pavia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Philadelphia School District v. B. A. Shrages Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Independent Bridge Co. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Gedeon v. ShoupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API