Legal Opinion

Gedeon v. Shoup

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, No. 20PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Magdalena Shoup, appellant, instituted assumpsit in the court below against the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States upon an insurance policy on the life of her father, Andrew A. Gedeon, wherein his wife, Amalia, was the original beneficiary. After her death, his son, Peter L. Gedeon, was substituted as beneficiary, and subsequently Andrew formally requested the insurance company to substitute Magdalena as the beneficiary.

Meanwhile Peter had brought suit upon the same policy in Crawford County. The insurance company filed a petition for an interpleader in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Riley v. WirthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Kittaning Coal Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Grant v. FairesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Lacy v. East Broad Top Railroad & Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Skamoricus v. KonagiskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Forrest Hills Corp. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. MAURICE A. NERNBERG & ASSOCIATES v. CoyneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Pychinka v. Keystone Home Improvement Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API