Legal Opinion

Tiedemann v. Johnson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 5, 1974PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

For our consideration is a cause before us on report pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. A decision of the cause requires us to interpret the Maine Income Tax Law, (36 M.R.S.A. § 5101 et seq.)

The questions presented for our decision are appropriately formulated as:

I. Whether, in computing taxable income under the Maine Income Tax Law, income received by installment payments subsequent to the effective date of the Tax Law, but arising from a sale of real estate completed prior to that date, may be subjected to taxation, and

II. Whether such taxation,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Cooper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Production Credit Ass'n v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. National Realty & Investment Co. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Estate of Kennett v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API