Tiedemann v. Johnson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
For our consideration is a cause before us on report pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. A decision of the cause requires us to interpret the Maine Income Tax Law, (36 M.R.S.A. § 5101 et seq.)
The questions presented for our decision are appropriately formulated as:
I. Whether, in computing taxable income under the Maine Income Tax Law, income received by installment payments subsequent to the effective date of the Tax Law, but arising from a sale of real estate completed prior to that date, may be subjected to taxation, and
II. Whether such taxation,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Cooper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Production Credit Ass'n v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- National Realty & Investment Co. v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Estate of Kennett v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.