Legal Opinion

Becker Roofing Co. v. Pike

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1935No. 6 Div. 700PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action is to recover damages for breach of contract to cover plaintiff’s residence with Becker Roofing, with warranties of material and workmanship, and covenants to repair any leaks from “(a) Windstorm, (b) Hail, (c) Defective material, (d) Faulty workmanship.”

Count C, on which the cause was tried, was not subject to objection on the ground of departure from the original cause of action set up in count 1.

The contract was in three parts or instruments: (1) A written order for a specified roof on a specified building at a specified price, signed by the owners; (2) a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. F. Becker Asphaltum Roofing Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Frierson v. FrazierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Beatty v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Gayle v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  5. Painter v. MunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. B & M HOMES, INC. v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. DillardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Sanford v. Western Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Rice v. Chrysler Motors CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Alabama Water Service Co. v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API