Robert Deal v. State- Corrected
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
On appeal from the trial court’s revocation of probation, Robert Deal argues that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion for continuance to retain private counsel; (2) relying on hearsay in finding that he left his county of residence; (3) finding that the State proved he had the ability to pay costs and willfully failed to do so; and (4) entering written revocation of probation orders which do not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. Because we reverse as to the first argument, the remainder of the arguments are moot.
This appeal involves three cases in which Deal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Alvarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
3Cited by7 opinions
- Markeria Roshwan Hillsman v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Valcarcel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- TERRY LEE BENTZ JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- FRANKLIN P. JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- ASHLEY NICOLE MCKENZIE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.