Leahy v. Hardy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The basis of the orders dismissing the complaints was that the defendant was an infant and proper service of the summons and complaint had not been made upon him.
The residence of the defendant and that of his parents was at Worcester, Mass. At the time the cause of action arose he was temporarily employed at Liberty, Sullivan county, by a contractor engaged in building a hospital. It was supposed that he was of full age; and after service of the summons and complaint an attorney appeared for him serving answers. It was not until the actions were on the trial calendar that it was discovered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ingersoll v. . MangamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Camp & Ball v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Hope v. ShevillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Boylen v. McAvoyNew York Supreme Court · 1865
- Hope v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Estate of SpringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Pacilio v. ScarpatiCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
- Lella v. HolmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1938
- Randall v. RandallNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Caruso v. CaputoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.